FIRM UPDATE: Our offices are open and we are accepting new clients. To protect our community and our legal team in response to the threat of COVID-19, we are offering video and telephone consultations. Please call or email our office to discuss your options.
Menu Contact
  • Super Lawyers
  • Avvo
  • The National Trial Lawyers
  • AV Preeminent | Martindale-Hubbell LawyerRating

Employment discrimination against expectant mothers is illegal!

The National Women's Law Center recently filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Department of Education that offers valuable insights for working mothers-to-be. Although arising in an educational context, the case has many aspects that are closely analogous to employment discrimination disputes. The complaint involves a woman who was attending a Missouri chiropractic school during a difficult pregnancy that terminated with a Caesarean section delivery. Associated medical complications apparently caused her to be unable to attend several class meetings and submit assignments on time.

College administrators offered her the option of either withdrawing from her doctoral-level professional studies or accepting a severe academic penalty for excessive absences. Because the absences were due to medical reasons, attorneys for the non-profit legal services organization contend that the school violated applicable federal statutes that prohibit sex discrimination by educational institutions.

Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act includes comparable federal provisions designed to safeguard employee rights by prohibiting employers from engaging in workplace discrimination by penalizing medical-related job absenteeism. This legislative prohibition extends to policies that seemingly have legitimate purposes yet result in race discrimination, age discrimination, disability discrimination, and/or religious discrimination.

This is often referred to as 'disparate impact" discrimination, actions or policies that have disproportionately adverse impact on specific protected groups and applies even if internal policies or procedures are not deliberately discriminatory. The woman's case is a perfect example of this type of subtle discrimination because it involves a health condition exclusive to females. As such, employer actions or practices that adversely affect pregnant women more than other workers may be legally impermissible.

Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Mo. student punished for pregnancy settles claim", December 10, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Tell Us About Your Case. Get A Free Consultation Speak With A Compassionate, Devoted Attorney Today. Please Call 816-399-5149.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Holman Schiavone, LLC
4600 Madison Avenue
Suite 810
Kansas City, MO 64112

Toll Free: 888-493-5074
Phone: 816-399-5149
Fax: 816-283-8739
Map & Directions

Review Us
Google Map