A form that say personal injury claim form with a calculator, pen and glasses.

If you’ve been injured in an accident, understanding your state’s comparative fault rules is crucial in determining how much compensation you can receive for your injuries. Your compensation could be reduced or even denied based on your share of responsibility. Comparative fault, also known as contributory negligence, is a legal concept that reduces the amount of damages you can recover based on your share of fault in causing the accident.

Holman Schiavone Law, LLC has the experience and dedication to handle the comparative fault in your claim, ensuring that your compensation is maximized. Our adept legal team will meticulously analyze the details of your case, challenge any unfair assessments of your responsibility, and fight to minimize your share of fault, thereby enhancing your rightful compensation. Don’t let legal nuances deter you from seeking the justice you deserve. 

Reach out to us at 816-399-5149 for a thorough free consultation, and let us advocate for your rights and the best possible outcome in your case.

Understanding Kansas City’s Comparative Fault System in Kansas vs Missouri


Comparative Fault in Missouri

Kansas City, Missouri, follows the comparative fault system for personal injury claims. Under this system, an injured party’s compensation is adjusted based on their share of responsibility in causing the accident. If you are found to have contributed to the accident, the compensation you would receive would be decreased accordingly. This system can have a notable impact on the financial recovery you can expect from your personal injury case.

Pure Comparative Fault in Missouri

Examining Missouri’s pure comparative fault model reveals a few key points. Unlike some states where even a small degree of fault can bar recovery entirely, Missouri allows injured parties to recover damages even if they are partially responsible for the accident. This means that even if you are found to be 99% at fault for an accident, you can still receive 1% of the total compensation.

This system allows victims to recover some damages, regardless of their degree of fault. On the downside, it can significantly reduce the amount of compensation they receive. By securing the services of a seasoned personal injury lawyer, such as those at Holman Schiavone Law, LLC, victims can maximize their chances of receiving fair compensation for their injuries and losses. Our legal team can gather evidence, interview witnesses, and argue effectively on your behalf to minimize your percentage of fault and maximize your compensation, ensuring that your rights are fully protected.

Comparative Fault in Kansas

Kansas uses a different approach. The state implements a modified comparative negligence rule, which reduces damages in proportion to the plaintiff’s contribution to the accident. Furthermore, recovery is barred if the plaintiff’s contribution is found to be significant enough to surpass a certain threshold. This means that if you are found to have a substantial responsibility in the accident, compared to the other party involved, you will not be eligible for any compensation in Kansas.

Modified Comparative Negligence in Kansas

In contrast to Missouri’s system, Kansas follows a modified comparative negligence rule. Under this system, an injured party’s compensation is proportionally reduced by their degree of fault. However, there’s a catch. If you’re found to be 50% or more at fault, you’re barred from recovering any damages. This means that the stakes are significantly higher in Kansas personal injury cases.

This rule can drastically affect the outcome of a personal injury case. For instance, if you’re involved in a car accident and found to be 51% at fault, you’ll walk away with nothing, despite suffering injuries. This underscores the need for a skilled personal injury lawyer who can steer through these intricacies and construct a solid case proving your degree of fault is below 50%.

How Comparative Fault Affects Personal Injury Claims

Regardless of whether you’re in Missouri or Kansas, the comparative fault system significantly influences personal injury claims. The system works by assigning a percentage of fault to each party involved in the accident. This percentage is then used to calculate the proportion of compensation each party is eligible to receive. It’s a delicate balance that can be tipped by the smallest details, making it a complex yet critical aspect of personal injury cases.

Although it may appear simple, calculating these percentages is far from a straightforward task. It involves a thorough evaluation of the evidence, which includes accident reports, eyewitness accounts, and sometimes even traffic camera footage.

The court also considers factors like whether a party assumed an unreasonable risk or failed to take measures to avoid or mitigate injuries. This determines fault percentages, a highly technical task, often requiring the help of an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Determining Fault Percentages

Determining fault percentages in a personal injury case is a complicated process. It involves a thorough evaluation of all the evidence available, including:

  • Accident reports
  • Traffic camera footage
  • Eyewitness accounts
  • Expert testimony

The court uses this evidence to gain a detailed understanding of the circumstances surrounding the accident, ultimately assigning a percentage of fault to each party involved.

The process is not solely reliant on the raw facts. The court also takes into account factors like whether the injured party assumed an unreasonable risk, misused a product unreasonably, or failed to take measures to avoid or mitigate injuries. These considerations can drastically affect the final fault percentages, making it crucial to have an experienced personal injury attorney who can argue effectively on your behalf.

The Importance of Legal Representation in Comparative Fault Cases

Considering the intricacies of comparative fault cases, the need for a skilled personal injury attorney is apparent. They can work to limit the amount of fault assigned to you, thereby maximizing your potential compensation. They have a thorough understanding of the legal principles involved in evaluating negligence and comparative negligence, which can be invaluable in building a strong case.

The responsibilities of a personal injury attorney extend beyond mere legal counsel. They offer comprehensive support throughout the case, handling legal burdens, advocating for your rights, and guiding you through the often bewildering legal process. It’s advisable to consult with a personal injury attorney as soon as possible after receiving necessary medical attention for your injuries. This can ensure that your rights are protected and that you’re on the right track for a successful claim.

Building a Strong Case

Constructing a resilient case in a comparative fault scenario involves multiple stages. An experienced personal injury attorney can:

  • Gather crucial evidence, such as photographs, video recordings, medical reports, and forensic analysis
  • Analyze each piece of evidence to provide valuable insights into the accident
  • Build a comprehensive picture of the events
  • Establish the degree of fault of each party involved

In addition to gathering evidence, attorneys also interview witnesses to gain a full understanding of the circumstances surrounding the accident. They scrutinize the relevance and admissibility of evidence, especially in cases where defendants may suggest factors like the plaintiff’s drug or alcohol use. This rigorous approach ensures that your case is as strong as possible, maximizing your chances of receiving the compensation you deserve.

Negotiating with Insurance Companies

In negotiations with insurance companies, the presence of a seasoned personal injury attorney can prove to be priceless. Without proper legal representation, you risk making costly errors, such as unintentional admissions of fault, which can drastically reduce your personal injury claim compensation. An attorney can guide you through these conversations with the insurance company, ensuring that your claim is not unjustly dismissed and that you receive the correct amount of compensation.

Personal injury attorneys have the experience in personal injury law to handle most personal injury claims and personal injury lawsuits:

  • Negotiate effectively with insurance companies
  • Advocate for you to receive the rightful compensation you deserve, which you may not be able to secure on your own
  • Handle the complexities of proving negligence, especially when insurance companies try to shift more fault onto you to reduce settlements

In such cases, having an attorney can make all the difference.

Common Challenges in Comparative Fault Cases

As with any legal procedure, comparative fault cases present a set of challenges. Proving the extent of negligence for each involved party often requires detailed investigations and expert testimony. Additionally, other factors, such as the plaintiff’s prior substance use, can complicate matters. Even if such factors were not a substantial cause of the injuries, they can still affect the establishment of liability.

The comparative negligence principle, which includes contributory negligence, can lead to a more involved trial process as each party attempts to establish their degree of fault. All these factors underscore the importance of having an experienced personal injury attorney to guide you through the process.

Tips for Protecting Your Rights in a Comparative Fault Case

Multiple measures can be adopted to safeguard your rights in a comparative fault case. First, it’s crucial to seek prompt medical attention following an accident. This ensures that your injuries are officially recorded, providing strong evidence for your case. Additionally, meticulously documenting your economic damages, such as medical expenses and lost wages, can support your compensation claim.

Remember, the actions you take immediately following an accident can significantly impact the outcome of your case, so it’s crucial to make informed decisions.

Holman Schiavone Law, LLC Can Help You

At Holman Schiavone Law, LLC, we understand that every case is unique, and so are your needs and goals. That’s why we tailor our counsel and representation to your specific situation. Our record of jury verdicts and litigation success influences resolutions and settlements in our client’s favor. From personal injury cases stemming from car accidents and slip and fall injuries to workplace harassment and discrimination, we’ve got you covered.

Let us handle the legal complexities while you focus on your recovery. Take action now and give yourself the advantage of our legal representation. Call Holman Schiavone Law, LLC at 816-399-5149 for a comprehensive free consultation. Together, we can strive for the justice and compensation you deserve.

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparative fault, also known as contributory negligence, allocates responsibility for an accident based on the percentage of fault each party contributed, directly affecting the amount of compensation for injuries.

In a pure comparative fault system, injured parties can recover damages even if they are partially at fault, while in a modified comparative negligence system, recovery is barred if the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault. This is an important distinction to consider in assessing the impact of fault on legal proceedings.

In a personal injury case, the percentage of fault is determined by the court based on evidence such as accident reports, eyewitness accounts, and traffic camera footage, as well as relevant factors like assumption of risk or failure to take preventive measures.

If the defense of comparative negligence applies, victims can still recover damages from a defendant but their compensation will be reduced based on their own contribution to the accident. It’s important to understand how this defense can affect the outcome of a case.

In Kansas, the comparative fault rule stipulates that an injured party can only recover compensation if their own contributory negligence is less than 50%. Additionally, the amount of compensation is reduced by the same percentage as their contributory negligence, promoting equitable compensation for all parties involved in a case. In contrast, Missouri follows a pure comparative fault model, which allows an injured party to recover damages even if they are 99% at fault, although their recovery will be reduced by their percentage of fault. This key difference between Kansas and Missouri can significantly influence the outcome of personal injury cases in these states.